diff --git a/src/test/java/com/eactive/eai/agent/inflow/ReloadInflowClientControlCommandTest.java b/src/test/java/com/eactive/eai/agent/inflow/ReloadInflowClientControlCommandTest.java
index c666b33..d0d4985 100644
--- a/src/test/java/com/eactive/eai/agent/inflow/ReloadInflowClientControlCommandTest.java
+++ b/src/test/java/com/eactive/eai/agent/inflow/ReloadInflowClientControlCommandTest.java
@@ -3,32 +3,35 @@ package com.eactive.eai.agent.inflow;
 import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.*;
 import static org.mockito.Mockito.*;
 
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.AfterEach;
 import org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeEach;
 import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
-import org.springframework.context.ApplicationContext;
 import org.springframework.test.util.ReflectionTestUtils;
 
 import com.eactive.eai.agent.command.CommandException;
 import com.eactive.eai.common.inflow.InflowControlManager;
+import com.eactive.eai.common.inflow.InflowControlUtil;
 import com.eactive.eai.common.inflow.dual.DualInflowControlManager;
-import com.eactive.eai.common.util.ApplicationContextProvider;
 
 /**
  * ReloadInflowClientControlCommand 단위 테스트.
  *
- * <p>ApplicationContextProvider의 static context 필드에 mock ApplicationContext를 주입하여
- * InflowControlManager.getInstance() 반환값을 제어한다.
+ * <p>InflowControlUtil의 cachedInflowControlManager 필드에 mock을 직접 주입하여
+ * PropManager/ApplicationContext 없이 동작을 검증한다.
  */
 class ReloadInflowClientControlCommandTest {
 
-    private ApplicationContext mockContext;
     private DualInflowControlManager mockDualManager;
 
     @BeforeEach
     void setUp() {
-        mockContext     = mock(ApplicationContext.class);
         mockDualManager = mock(DualInflowControlManager.class);
-        ReflectionTestUtils.setField(ApplicationContextProvider.class, "context", mockContext);
+        ReflectionTestUtils.setField(InflowControlUtil.class, "cachedInflowControlManager", null);
+    }
+
+    @AfterEach
+    void tearDown() {
+        ReflectionTestUtils.setField(InflowControlUtil.class, "cachedInflowControlManager", null);
     }
 
     private ReloadInflowClientControlCommand commandWith(Object args) {
@@ -43,10 +46,8 @@ class ReloadInflowClientControlCommandTest {
 
     @Test
     void execute_argsIsInteger_throwsCommandException() {
-        ReloadInflowClientControlCommand cmd = commandWith(Integer.valueOf(1));
-
-        assertThrows(CommandException.class, cmd::execute);
-        verifyNoInteractions(mockContext);
+        // args 검증이 getInflowControlManager() 호출 이전에 발생하므로 캐시 설정 불필요
+        assertThrows(CommandException.class, commandWith(Integer.valueOf(1))::execute);
     }
 
     // =========================================================================
@@ -56,11 +57,9 @@ class ReloadInflowClientControlCommandTest {
     @Test
     void execute_notDualManager_throwsCommandException() {
         InflowControlManager baseMgr = mock(InflowControlManager.class);
-        when(mockContext.getBean(InflowControlManager.class)).thenReturn(baseMgr);
+        ReflectionTestUtils.setField(InflowControlUtil.class, "cachedInflowControlManager", baseMgr);
 
-        ReloadInflowClientControlCommand cmd = commandWith("CLIENT_A");
-
-        assertThrows(CommandException.class, cmd::execute);
+        assertThrows(CommandException.class, commandWith("CLIENT_A")::execute);
     }
 
     // =========================================================================
@@ -69,7 +68,7 @@ class ReloadInflowClientControlCommandTest {
 
     @Test
     void execute_argsIsALL_callsReloadClientNoArgs() throws Exception {
-        when(mockContext.getBean(InflowControlManager.class)).thenReturn(mockDualManager);
+        ReflectionTestUtils.setField(InflowControlUtil.class, "cachedInflowControlManager", mockDualManager);
 
         Object result = commandWith("ALL").execute();
 
@@ -84,7 +83,7 @@ class ReloadInflowClientControlCommandTest {
 
     @Test
     void execute_argsIsClientId_callsReloadClientWithId() throws Exception {
-        when(mockContext.getBean(InflowControlManager.class)).thenReturn(mockDualManager);
+        ReflectionTestUtils.setField(InflowControlUtil.class, "cachedInflowControlManager", mockDualManager);
 
         Object result = commandWith("CLIENT_A").execute();
 
@@ -95,7 +94,7 @@ class ReloadInflowClientControlCommandTest {
 
     @Test
     void execute_differentClientId_callsReloadClientWithThatId() throws Exception {
-        when(mockContext.getBean(InflowControlManager.class)).thenReturn(mockDualManager);
+        ReflectionTestUtils.setField(InflowControlUtil.class, "cachedInflowControlManager", mockDualManager);
 
         commandWith("CLIENT_B").execute();
 
diff --git a/src/test/java/com/eactive/eai/agent/inflow/RemoveInflowClientControlCommandTest.java b/src/test/java/com/eactive/eai/agent/inflow/RemoveInflowClientControlCommandTest.java
index c55e07e..10cff5b 100644
--- a/src/test/java/com/eactive/eai/agent/inflow/RemoveInflowClientControlCommandTest.java
+++ b/src/test/java/com/eactive/eai/agent/inflow/RemoveInflowClientControlCommandTest.java
@@ -3,32 +3,35 @@ package com.eactive.eai.agent.inflow;
 import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.*;
 import static org.mockito.Mockito.*;
 
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.AfterEach;
 import org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeEach;
 import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
-import org.springframework.context.ApplicationContext;
 import org.springframework.test.util.ReflectionTestUtils;
 
 import com.eactive.eai.agent.command.CommandException;
 import com.eactive.eai.common.inflow.InflowControlManager;
+import com.eactive.eai.common.inflow.InflowControlUtil;
 import com.eactive.eai.common.inflow.dual.DualInflowControlManager;
-import com.eactive.eai.common.util.ApplicationContextProvider;
 
 /**
  * RemoveInflowClientControlCommand 단위 테스트.
  *
- * <p>ApplicationContextProvider의 static context 필드에 mock ApplicationContext를 주입하여
- * InflowControlManager.getInstance() 반환값을 제어한다.
+ * <p>InflowControlUtil의 cachedInflowControlManager 필드에 mock을 직접 주입하여
+ * PropManager/ApplicationContext 없이 동작을 검증한다.
  */
 class RemoveInflowClientControlCommandTest {
 
-    private ApplicationContext mockContext;
     private DualInflowControlManager mockDualManager;
 
     @BeforeEach
     void setUp() {
-        mockContext     = mock(ApplicationContext.class);
         mockDualManager = mock(DualInflowControlManager.class);
-        ReflectionTestUtils.setField(ApplicationContextProvider.class, "context", mockContext);
+        ReflectionTestUtils.setField(InflowControlUtil.class, "cachedInflowControlManager", null);
+    }
+
+    @AfterEach
+    void tearDown() {
+        ReflectionTestUtils.setField(InflowControlUtil.class, "cachedInflowControlManager", null);
     }
 
     private RemoveInflowClientControlCommand commandWith(Object args) {
@@ -43,10 +46,7 @@ class RemoveInflowClientControlCommandTest {
 
     @Test
     void execute_argsIsInteger_throwsCommandException() {
-        RemoveInflowClientControlCommand cmd = commandWith(Integer.valueOf(1));
-
-        assertThrows(CommandException.class, cmd::execute);
-        verifyNoInteractions(mockContext);
+        assertThrows(CommandException.class, commandWith(Integer.valueOf(1))::execute);
     }
 
     // =========================================================================
@@ -56,11 +56,9 @@ class RemoveInflowClientControlCommandTest {
     @Test
     void execute_notDualManager_throwsCommandException() {
         InflowControlManager baseMgr = mock(InflowControlManager.class);
-        when(mockContext.getBean(InflowControlManager.class)).thenReturn(baseMgr);
+        ReflectionTestUtils.setField(InflowControlUtil.class, "cachedInflowControlManager", baseMgr);
 
-        RemoveInflowClientControlCommand cmd = commandWith("CLIENT_A");
-
-        assertThrows(CommandException.class, cmd::execute);
+        assertThrows(CommandException.class, commandWith("CLIENT_A")::execute);
     }
 
     // =========================================================================
@@ -69,7 +67,7 @@ class RemoveInflowClientControlCommandTest {
 
     @Test
     void execute_validClientId_callsRemoveClient() throws CommandException {
-        when(mockContext.getBean(InflowControlManager.class)).thenReturn(mockDualManager);
+        ReflectionTestUtils.setField(InflowControlUtil.class, "cachedInflowControlManager", mockDualManager);
 
         Object result = commandWith("CLIENT_A").execute();
 
@@ -79,7 +77,7 @@ class RemoveInflowClientControlCommandTest {
 
     @Test
     void execute_differentClientId_callsRemoveClientWithThatId() throws Exception {
-        when(mockContext.getBean(InflowControlManager.class)).thenReturn(mockDualManager);
+        ReflectionTestUtils.setField(InflowControlUtil.class, "cachedInflowControlManager", mockDualManager);
 
         commandWith("CLIENT_B").execute();
 
@@ -88,7 +86,7 @@ class RemoveInflowClientControlCommandTest {
 
     @Test
     void execute_validClientId_doesNotCallReload() throws Exception {
-        when(mockContext.getBean(InflowControlManager.class)).thenReturn(mockDualManager);
+        ReflectionTestUtils.setField(InflowControlUtil.class, "cachedInflowControlManager", mockDualManager);
 
         commandWith("CLIENT_A").execute();